We got a mapping example from RTE, they already created a mapping between CIM files and IEC 61850 files.
We used the IEC 623610-102 standard to compare it with the example we got from RTE.
The goal is to compare a few components, to see if we are able to say: We can use this mapping!
This way, we don’t have to figure it all out ourselves.
Findings
We see the following CIM components in the mapping example:
Substation seems to be okay, there might be some tricky situations I’m not aware of.
PowerTransformer* looks not complete. According to the IEC 62361-102 standard, the SCL equivalent is ‘TransformerWinding’, this is done differently.
Components like Terminal and Bay are looking fine!
Missing some SCL elements
whole ‘Process’ SCL element mapping
whole ‘Line’ SCL element mapping
whole ‘GeneralEquipment’ SCL element mapping
whole ‘SubEquipment’ SCL element mapping
whole ‘Function’/’SubFunction’/’EqFunction’/’EqSubFunction’ SCL element mapping
whole ‘Tapchanger’ SCL element mapping
Questions
the open_substation.scd file contains a SCL section. Is this considered the header? (Because it has stuff like version and revision in it)
What to do with the Header section of an SCL file? Create a new one?
Conclusion
Part of the mapping is according the standard, part of the mapping is missing standard information (Like Process and Line).
I think it’s good to use it as a reference, but we have to dig into the IEC 62361-102 ourselves to complete the mapping.